What Happens if VAR is Wrong? Understanding Official Protocols
The Finality of the Decision: Law 5
- The Restart Rule: If the VAR fails to intervene or gives the wrong advice, and the referee restarts play, the error is legally "locked in."
- Official Admissions: Leagues like the Premier League or La Liga may release statements acknowledging a "clear and obvious error" was missed.
- No Score Changes: Even if a goal was wrongly disallowed, the league cannot add that goal to the scoreline after the final whistle.
- Points Retention: The team that benefited from the error keeps the points. There is no mechanism to "deduct" points gained from a bad officiating call.
- Match Integrity: Governing bodies prioritize the "finality of the result" over absolute accuracy to ensure the betting and sporting markets remain stable.
- Exception for Identity: The only time a decision is usually corrected post-match is for "Mistaken Identity" regarding red or yellow cards.
Types of VAR Errors and Their Impacts
- Factual and Technical Errors 📌 These occur when the technology itself fails or is used incorrectly. For example, drawing offside lines from the wrong player or failing to see a ball crossed the line.
- Communication Breakdowns 📌 This happens when the VAR and the referee misunderstand each other. A famous example is the Luis Diaz disallowed goal, where the VAR thought the on-field decision was "goal," so he said "check complete" to confirm it, but the ref had actually called it "offside."
- Subjective Judgment Errors 📌 These are the most common. It is when the VAR looks at a foul and decides it isn't "clear and obvious" enough to overturn, even if most people disagree.
- Protocol Breaches 📌 This occurs if the VAR intervenes in a situation they aren't allowed to, such as a second yellow card or a standard free kick in the middle of the pitch.
Accountability: What Happens to the Officials?
- Internal Grading Every match is reviewed by a panel. Officials receive scores based on their performance, including their use of VAR.
- Demotion to Lower Divisions A referee or VAR who makes a high-profile mistake is often "stood down" for the following week or demoted to the Championship/lower leagues to regain focus.
- Mandatory Retraining Officials may undergo simulation training to correct specific issues, such as communication speed or technical line-drawing.
- Public Statements In extreme cases, the head of refereeing (e.g., Howard Webb) will appear on television to explain the error and apologize to the affected club.
- Audio Release Leagues are increasingly releasing the "VAR Audio" to the public to provide transparency into how the mistake happened.
Can a Match Be Replayed?
| Type of Failure | Likelihood of Replay | Real-World Example |
|---|---|---|
| Human Judgment Error | 0% | Missed penalty or red card. |
| Communication Error | 0.1% (Near zero) | Luis Diaz offside (Spurs vs Liverpool). |
| Technical/Software Failure | Very Low | Goal-line tech failure (Sheffield Utd vs Villa). |
| Breach of Competition Rules | Possible (Rare) | Anderlecht vs Genk (Initial replay ordered, then overturned). |
How Clubs Respond to VAR Mistakes
Clubs have developed several strategies to deal with the fallout when VAR is wrong. Since they cannot change the result, they focus on long-term systemic change and protecting their interests.
- Formal Complaints: Clubs submit detailed dossiers to the league demanding explanations for specific incidents.
- Requesting VAR Audio: Clubs often demand the private audio recordings to see if there was a "process failure" rather than just a "bad call."
- Legal Action: Some clubs have threatened to sue leagues for loss of earnings (e.g., if they miss the Champions League due to an error), though no major case has succeeded yet.
- Voting on VAR: In some leagues, clubs have the power to vote on whether to keep VAR, scrap it, or change how it is implemented.
- Public Pressure: Managers use post-match interviews to highlight errors, often accepting fines to ensure the media keeps the pressure on refereeing bodies.
The Psychological Impact on Referees
When a VAR error occurs, the official's confidence can be shattered. Many referees report feeling "paralyzed" by the fear of making a mistake that will be replayed millions of times on social media. This leads to a phenomenon called "refereeing for the VAR," where officials wait to blow their whistle because they hope the technology will save them.
Leagues now provide psychological support for officials who have been involved in major VAR controversies. The goal is to ensure they can return to the pitch without carrying the "ghost" of their previous mistakes into the next match.
How Fans Can Track VAR Errors
If you are a fan wondering how your team has been affected, there are now several "VAR Tables" that track every incident throughout the season. These tables attempt to show what the league standings would look like if no VAR errors occurred.
These trackers distinguish between "VAR Interventions" (which are usually correct) and "Confirmed Errors" (admitted by the league). While these tables are unofficial, they provide a fascinating look at which teams are the luckiest—and unluckiest—in the league. Monitoring these statistics helps fans understand that over a 38-game season, errors often (but not always) balance out.
Leagues are also becoming more transparent. Programs like "Match Officials Mic'd Up" allow fans to hear the decision-making process. This transparency doesn't fix the error, but it helps fans understand *why* the mistake happened, which can reduce the feeling of conspiracy or bias.
The Future: Eliminating the Margin of Error
To prevent "What happens if VAR is wrong?" from being a weekly headline, football is moving toward Semi-Automated Technology. This aims to take the decision-making power away from humans in factual scenarios.
Semi-automated offside technology (SAOT) uses 12 dedicated cameras and limb-tracking data to determine offside positions instantly. This eliminates the need for a human to manually "draw the lines," which is where most errors occur. Similarly, "smart balls" with internal sensors can tell exactly when a ball was kicked, providing the VAR with the perfect frame every time.
By automating the factual parts of the game, the VAR team can focus entirely on the subjective parts—like fouls and handballs. This should, in theory, lead to fewer apologies and a more consistent experience for everyone involved in the beautiful game.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Can a referee change a VAR decision after the game? No. Once the final whistle blows and the referee leaves the pitch, the match result is legally sealed.
- Do players get their yellow cards rescinded if the VAR was wrong? Only in cases of "Mistaken Identity." If a player was wrongly booked for a foul that wasn't theirs, it can be overturned. Standard "bad" yellow cards are not overturned.
- Has a Premier League match ever been replayed due to VAR? No. Despite several massive errors and formal requests from clubs, the Premier League has never ordered a replay for an officiating mistake.
- Does the VAR get fined for mistakes? While they aren't usually fined money, they lose "match fees" if they are stood down or demoted to lower-league games as punishment.
- Why don't they just use AI for everything? AI is great for lines and ball tracking, but it cannot judge "intent" or "excessive force," which are key to deciding red cards and penalties.
The Bottom Line on VAR Failures
When VAR is wrong, the sporting world moves on, however unfairly. The points stay where they are, the referee gets a week off, and the fans wait for the next weekend. The only real solution is the continued evolution of technology and the improvement of human training to ensure that these errors happen as rarely as possible.
